Monday, August 8, 2011

Midterm- Photographic Book Critique


A Constructed View: The Architectural Photography of Julius Shulman- Joseph Rosa

            Form, line, curves, glass, wood, metal… all various elements and components that come together in architecture. Most people walk past a building, they walk by giving little thought or consideration to the elements involved in that building. They don’t think about the countless details that go into the construction of that structure. It is merely a building where people work, live, go to school, or pray to their chosen deity. For others though, they see beyond the purpose of the building or it’s inhabitants. They see the clean lines, the carefully crafted curves, the perfectly placed arches, or every other delicate element that make up that structure. As a photography you must train your eyes to see what others don’t. Architectural photographers do much more than look at the building as a whole and create a well lit photograph. Like the architect who first drew the plans for the building, the photographer must create a plan to photograph the structure. All elements must be considered and worked into the finished photograph.

            As a child growing up in the greater Los Angeles area I was amazed, and still am to this day, at the wonderful architecture that makes up my lovely city. The buildings and glittery Hollywood homes are to me what give Los Angeles so much of it’s character. For me it is such a great treat to see a photographer who was able to capture those structures so wonderfully.

Julius Shulman seemed from an early age to show a great appreciation for architectural elements. Without much training or schooling he picked up his camera and captured buildings and other architectural elements first around Los Angeles then around his campuses at UCLA then Berkeley.

            Too many photographers recently pick up their cameras or camera phones and snap away to excess with little to no thought consideration as to what they are shooting, or even why and how. After snapping away hundreds and sometimes thousands of images when they come across a handful good shots with decent light and exposure they pat themselves on the back and claim themselves worthy photographers. This is most notably seen on the Las Vegas Blvd street on a daily basis. Tourists coming through town and snapping away with little regard to what they are photographing or even why.

When I look at the work of Julius Shulman I am reminded very clearly how much thought and planning should go into a well constructed photograph. Architectural photography doesn’t happen by chance and takes much more skill than a tourist walking down the Strip snapping away. It isn’t very easy to understand the complicities in photographing a great structure or building living here in Las Vegas. There is a great lack of architectural wonders in the City of Sin. Yes we have a replica of the Eiffel Tower and a version of New York City, but all that is theme park type structures easily seen at Disneyland. To get a better understanding of great architecture look at older cities such as Los Angeles or the real NYC.
            The book shows many architectural elements from around the world. But the main focus seems to take place around Los Angeles. In a city that is filled with movie stars, political icons, everyday people, and powerful businessmen and women it is no wonder there is such a vast difference seen throughout the city. The architecture reflects this varied difference in status and background. I have always been fascinated by the great Hollywood homes of the rich and famous. My affinity also lies with the 1950’s and 60’s. There seemed to be a great playfulness in architecture in those years.

It is amazing to see these great homes of a day much before my time captured to perfectly by Shulman. The way he photographs these grand homes transforms me into the day these homes were sparkling and brand new. But while flipping the pages it is also just as fun to see a modest home in the suburbs of West Covina, a city just east of Los Angeles. I know this city well, as I grew up just a town next door. The photograph entitled House, an assignment Shulman did for Good Housekeeping, was taken in 1954. Since I know the area well, this house doesn’t seem too out of place even today. I can clearly see this home driving the streets of West Covina. But it is still so interesting to see this home of many years ago, a simple home in a quiet suburb outside Los Angeles among the huge, fancy Hollywood Hills homes.

Other than the beautifully shot homes, there are many other architectural elements throughout this book. Some photographs are of office buildings in New York City or even Mexico City, as well as an NBC transmitter. Overall I think the book is a fun stroll down a time that seems so foreign to us now. It is also a great study of the fun and amazing architecture of the 50’s and 60’s. Just about every page draws me in the closely examine the great details encaptured by Shulman.

Artist Statement

It is very difficult in our modern day to stand out as an artist. There have been so many amazing artists before you, and there will be after you. But as an artist, all I can focus on is the present and my own present. It is my main focus to show my point of view as well as I can.

It is my aspiration as a photographer to present my work as an insight into my own experiences and at some points my emotions. I take my photographs as a visual poem. Every photograph taken is a reflection of my emotional state and personality.

To me, it is such a cathartic experience to go out into the world and just photograph what I see. Sometimes I come home and haven't taken much more than snapshots of life, and there are those rare moments when I snap at the right time by simple coincidence or luck. The moment I capture something I can't take my eyes off is a wonderfully rewarding experience.

Monday, July 25, 2011

Week 3- Trading Places

New YOrk State 1970, Ken Josephson
This is one of those photos that many people would argue on the validity of it as an original work. There is originality in it, but to me it is not groundbreaking. The work for me lacks interest. I take a single glance and see enough of the photograph to get the idea and move on. I would like to say I look longer at the photo and see more, or find more interest in the subject. But it seems to fall flat. I have never been keen on artists who merely take photos of other photos. Nor do I believe any artist should be rewarded for this great lack of originality. There is very little work that goes behind taking a picture of another picture. I find it very hard to see beyond any other stance of that type of photography. Ideas are wonderful and fuel our artistic world. For me though there seems to be nothing substantial behind this idea or the work itself. When I see this piece it paints the image for me of a young man who is traveling alone and out of boredom has the idea to take photos of postcards along his journey as a way to amuse himself and pass the time. He doesn't even work to remove himself from the picture, but makes it blatant that this is a photo of a man taking a picture of a postcard.

Week 2

Monday, July 11, 2011

Week 1 Critique

Nikola Tamindzic "We Have All the Time in the World” 
http://www.homeofthevain.com

I found this photograph randomly searching online. This photographer's work automatically intrigued me. I found this particular photo interesting. Immediately when I saw this photo I had images and thoughts of Las Vegas. I have lived here over a year and still this city has so many mixed feelings for me. This photograph could have been taken in any city, outside of any hotel room, anywhere in the world. There seems to be a great isolation from the subject and the world outside. There is very little of the hotel room visible in the photo, and the subject seems almost like a ghost. Her back is almost fading into the darkness of the room. Her face is barely visible in the reflection on the window. This photograph looks as though it could be a high fashion print, or it could just be a work by an artist. The quality of the work is very clear. The lighting is perfect for this type of shot. Aesthetically I really think this photo does a great job of drawing the audience in and the tones and colors of the photo work well in creating a wonderful shot. This one photograph not only drives me to research more on this photographer, but also gives me a great deal of inspiration for future projects of my own.